Google Implements Two-Year Inactivity Cleanup to Bolster Security

In a bid to enhance cybersecurity and minimize potential risks, Google is set to purge inactive accounts that have not been accessed for at least two years starting this week.

Google introduced this policy in May, emphasizing its goal to mitigate security threats. Internal assessments revealed that dormant accounts are more susceptible to security issues, often employing outdated security measures like recycled passwords and lacking two-step verification. This makes them vulnerable to threats such as hacking, phishing, and spam.

Warnings have been issued to affected users since August, with repeated alerts sent to both impacted accounts and user-provided backup emails. The initial phase of the cleanup targets accounts that were created but never revisited by users.

The move is part of Google’s commitment to safeguard users’ private information and prevent unauthorized access, even for those no longer actively using their services, as outlined in an August policy update.

Google accounts encompass a range of services, including Gmail, Docs, Drive, and Photos. Consequently, all content within the Google suite of an inactive user is at risk of deletion.

Exceptions to the cleanup include accounts with active YouTube channels, those with remaining gift card balances, accounts used for purchasing digital items, and those with published apps on platforms like the Google Play store.

This decision represents a departure from Google’s previous policy in 2020, where user content was wiped from services they had ceased using, but the accounts remained active.

Oren Koren, CPO and Co-founder of cybersecurity firm Veriti, asserts that deleting old accounts is a crucial step in bolstering security. Old accounts are often perceived as low risk, creating opportunities for malicious actors. Deleting such accounts compels hackers to create new ones, now requiring phone number verification. Additionally, it eliminates older data that may have been compromised in a data breach.

Koren stated, “By proactively removing these accounts, Google effectively shrinks the attack surface available to cybercriminals,” highlighting a broader trend in cybersecurity: taking preemptive steps to fortify overall digital security landscapes.

To retain your account, a simple login to any Google service once every two years, along with activities such as reading an email, watching a video, or performing a single search, is sufficient.

Major Brands Cease Ad Spending on X Amid Growing Concerns Over Antisemitism and Hate Speech

In the wake of an escalating advertiser exodus over concerns about antisemitism and hate speech on Elon Musk’s social media platform, formerly known as Twitter and referred to as X, at least twelve major brands have halted their ad spending. Notable names like Fox Sports, Ubisoft, Axios, TechCrunch, and Paris Hilton’s 11:11 Media have all confirmed that they’ve suspended ad expenditures on X in recent days, joining other prominent advertisers who abandoned the platform last week.

This widespread departure of advertisers compounds the challenges for X, already struggling to regain the trust of brands since Musk’s takeover last year. Concurrently, an increasing number of X users are migrating to alternative platforms, with even the White House recently joining Threads, giving a boost to Meta’s X competitor.

The latest wave of withdrawals commenced when IBM announced the suspension of its advertising on X following a report from progressive media watchdog Media Matters, which revealed its ad appearing alongside pro-Nazi content on the platform. Musk’s public endorsement of an antisemitic conspiracy theory further fueled the advertiser revolt. Subsequently, major media brands like Disney, Paramount, Comcast, Lionsgate, NBCUniversal, and CNN-parent Warner Bros. Discovery also suspended their ad spending on X last Friday, though without specifying their reasons. Apple reportedly joined this exodus last week as well.

In response, X urged its advertising partners to safeguard what it termed “freedom of speech” and filed a lawsuit against Media Matters, accusing the watchdog of misrepresenting the likelihood of ads running alongside extremist content. While X claimed to have made pro-Nazi accounts identified by Media Matters ineligible for monetization, these accounts, along with other far-right and White supremacist ones reinstated by Musk, remain active on the platform. Despite X CEO Linda Yaccarino emphasizing brand safety controls, some advertisers, including the National Football League, have expressed concerns about hate speech but have not withdrawn their spending.

The company’s attempts to reassure advertisers have fallen short, with critics highlighting the continued presence of objectionable content on the platform. Musk’s recent endorsement of the debunked “Pizzagate” conspiracy theory has added to the growing unease surrounding X. The situation underscores a deepening crisis for the platform, both in terms of retaining advertisers and maintaining user loyalty.

OpenAI’s Leadership Shake-Up Resolved: Sam Altman Reinstated, New Board Faces Criticism for Lack of Diversity

The recent power struggle at OpenAI, which unfolded following the dismissal of co-founder Sam Altman, has come to a conclusion, with Altman making a return. However, the resolution raises questions about the future of the organization.

It’s as if OpenAI has undergone a transformation, leaving some to ponder if it has evolved into a different entity altogether, not necessarily for the better. Sam Altman, the former president of Y Combinator, is back in charge, but the legitimacy of his reinstatement is under scrutiny. The new board of directors is drawing criticism for its lack of diversity, consisting entirely of white males, and there are concerns about the potential shift from OpenAI’s original philanthropic goals to more profit-driven interests.

The original structure of OpenAI featured a six-person board, including Altman, chief scientist Ilya Sutskever, president Greg Brockman, entrepreneur Tasha McCauley, Quora CEO Adam D’Angelo, and Helen Toner from Georgetown’s Center for Security and Emerging Technologies. The board had control over the for-profit side of OpenAI, guided by a nonprofit with a stake in decision-making for activities, investments, and overall direction, all in line with the mission of ensuring the benefits of artificial general intelligence for humanity.

However, with the involvement of investors and powerful partners, challenges emerged. Altman’s sudden removal led to discontent among OpenAI’s backers, including Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and Vinod Khosla of Khosla Ventures, who expressed a desire for Altman’s return. Legal action was even contemplated by several major backers if negotiations failed to reinstate Altman.

After days of turmoil, a resolution was reached. Altman and Brockman returned, subject to a background investigation. A new transitional board was established, meeting one of Altman’s demands. OpenAI is set to maintain its structure, with capped profits for investors and a board empowered to make decisions not solely driven by revenue.

Despite claims of victory for the “good guys,” questions linger about the legitimacy of Altman’s return. Accusations of not being consistently candid and prioritizing growth over mission were leveled against him. The new board, consisting of Bret Taylor, Adam D’Angelo, and Larry Summers, raises concerns about diversity and inclusivity, with all-male initial appointments potentially violating European board seat regulations.

The lack of diversity in the board composition has drawn criticism from AI academics and experts. Concerns about Summers’ history of making unflattering remarks about women further fuel apprehensions. Critics argue that a board lacking deep knowledge of responsible AI use in society, coupled with a lack of diversity, is not a promising start for a company as influential as OpenAI.

The decision not to include well-known AI ethicists like Timnit Gebru or Margaret Mitchell in the initial board appointment process raises questions about OpenAI’s commitment to addressing challenges related to AI bias and responsible use. The absence of such voices may impact the board’s ability to consistently prioritize these important issues.

Regulatory Crackdown on Cryptocurrency Industry in the US Raises Concerns of Industry Exile

In recent years, the cryptocurrency industry has faced increasing scrutiny and regulatory challenges in the United States, leading to concerns that the country is becoming increasingly hostile towards digital assets. Andrew Durgee, managing director of the crypto division for tech firm Republic, estimates that only one out of every ten firms his company invests in this year will be based in the US, reflecting the perceived regulatory uncertainty and higher risks associated with operating in the country.

The industry has faced significant pressure following the collapse of virtual currency prices last year and the subsequent meltdown of high-profile firms. US regulators have intensified their oversight, taking action against crypto firms and executives for various violations, ranging from failure to register properly with authorities to allegations of mishandling consumer funds and engaging in fraud.

While Bitcoin has been largely unaffected as it is considered a commodity, other digital assets issued by firms have faced scrutiny, particularly those involved in fundraising through tokens or coins. Major platforms such as Coinbase and Binance have recently faced legal actions, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has defended its actions, comparing the situation to the 1920s and warning of “hucksters” and “fraudsters” in the industry.

The sentiment towards the crypto industry has significantly soured since 2021 when it was valued at over $3 trillion. Trust in the system has eroded, and recent lawsuits have led to customers withdrawing billions of dollars from platforms. US banks have also limited their interactions with certain crypto entities, and some trading apps have delisted specific assets due to the uncertainty surrounding their regulatory status.

Critics argue that the SEC, under Chairman Gary Gensler, is pursuing “regulation by enforcement” and failing to acknowledge the distinctions between different types of crypto firms and the unique characteristics of the technology. Some industry insiders believe there is an ongoing regulatory attack on the industry, making it challenging for crypto firms to find banks willing to work with them.

While concerns about the future of the US crypto industry persist, some remain optimistic. Bart Stephens, managing partner of venture capital firm Blockchain Capital, suggests that the future may lie overseas, as the US regulatory environment is perceived as less friendly compared to other jurisdictions like the UK and the EU. Despite market volatility and declining trust, indicators such as the number of active blockchain addresses and executed smart contracts show signs of growth.

As the regulatory landscape unfolds, the industry finds itself at a critical juncture. The outcomes of ongoing legal battles, proposed legislation in Congress, and potential policy changes at the federal level could determine the future of the crypto industry in the US. While the industry may continue to thrive globally, losing the American market would undoubtedly restrict its growth potential, raising concerns about the overall industry’s size and future trajectory.

The US crypto industry and regulators are poised for a showdown, with the decisions and actions taken in the coming months having a profound impact on the sector’s future.

PhotoRoom and Google Cloud Join Forces to Revolutionize AI-Powered Image Generation

In a groundbreaking collaboration, leading AI photo editing app PhotoRoom has partnered with Google Cloud, aiming to revolutionize image generation by significantly speeding up the process while reducing costs. Recognized as the “fastest generative AI provider in the commerce space,” PhotoRoom’s software empowers businesses to create and edit product images for e-commerce platforms with utmost efficiency.

Through this partnership, PhotoRoom plans to leverage Google’s A3 supercomputers to enhance AI performance. The integration of these powerful computing resources will dramatically reduce product photography production times for small businesses and entrepreneurs, slashing them from days to less than an hour, all while maintaining impeccable accuracy and quality.

Product photography and editing play a vital role in the creation of commercial content, demanding high-quality visuals produced rapidly. PhotoRoom’s photo editor simplifies image manipulation, allowing companies to enhance product shots and incorporate AI-generated backgrounds. The platform also offers free photo editing tools like background and object removers.

Highlighting the exponential growth in generative AI usage, Matthieu Rouif, CEO of PhotoRoom, stated, “We’re already processing 2 billion images per year, and we expect that to double in 2024 as more businesses adopt PhotoRoom’s generative AI technology. Google Cloud provides the ideal foundation for our continued success with its scalable infrastructure, flexibility, and sustainable approach.”

The utilization of Google Cloud’s A3 instances proves to be a compelling choice. Unveiled in May 2023, these state-of-the-art GPU supercomputers are designed to train and deliver the most demanding AI models for generative AI and LLMs. This partnership not only benefits PhotoRoom but also strengthens Google’s B2B focus, solidifying its commitment to democratizing artificial intelligence on a global scale.

Mark Lohmeyer, Vice President and General Manager of Google Cloud expressed enthusiasm about the collaboration, stating, “We’re thrilled to offer Google Cloud’s industry-leading infrastructure, foundation models, and AI tooling to PhotoRoom. This partnership will enable the company to build, train, and deploy AI creatively, reliably, and at scale.”

Together, PhotoRoom and Google Cloud are set to reshape the landscape of AI-powered image generation, empowering businesses with unparalleled speed, accuracy, and cost-efficiency.

Reddit Faces Backlash as Thousands of Communities Go Dark in Protest

A massive wave of discontent is sweeping across Reddit as thousands of communities prepare to go offline on Monday in a protest against the platform’s management practices. The controversy stems from Reddit’s introduction of contentious charges for developers of third-party apps, which are widely used to browse the social media site. In response, moderators of some of Reddit’s largest subreddits have announced a 48-hour blackout, rendering nearly 3,500 subreddits inaccessible.

Subreddits are individual forums within the Reddit platform where communities gather to discuss specific interests. Reddit users, known as Redditors, actively participate in various subreddits to engage with like-minded individuals and consume content relevant to their interests. Unlike other social media platforms, Reddit heavily relies on community moderation. While the website has a few paid administrators, it predominantly operates with tens of thousands of unpaid moderators who work diligently to maintain the site’s functionality.

The backlash against Reddit’s recent actions revolves around the platform’s decision to impose charges on third-party app developers. This move has sparked criticism, prompting moderators to take a stand and restrict access to their communities. Five of the top ten most popular communities on Reddit, including r/gaming, r/aww, r/Music, r/todayilearned, and r/pics, boasting memberships of over 30 million users each, will participate in the blackout.

One moderator of a prominent subreddit explained the motivation behind the protest, emphasizing the power of collective action. They expressed that while Reddit might intervene if a single subreddit went private, the impact is significantly amplified when half the website goes dark. Moderators want to underscore the essential role they play in maintaining Reddit and send a clear message by disrupting the platform’s traffic.

The blackout primarily aims to draw attention to the fact that moderators are vital to the site’s operations. They highlight that their volunteer position is critical, as they invest substantial time and effort without financial compensation. The moderators believe that by orchestrating this mass protest, they can demonstrate to Reddit administrators the overwhelming opposition among both moderators and users to the proposed changes.

As “the front page of the internet,” Reddit has an official app, but it was developed many years after the website’s establishment. As a result, third-party apps such as Apollo, Reddit is Fun, Sync, and ReddPlanet emerged to enable users to access the platform on mobile devices. However, Reddit’s recent implementation of charges for third-party app developers has caused significant disruption. Developers of all four apps mentioned above have announced their decision to shut down due to the new API pricing structure.

Critics argue that Reddit’s charges are exorbitant, with the developer of Apollo, Christian Selig, estimating that it would cost him $20 million (£15.9 million) to continue operating the app. In response, a Reddit spokesperson defended the pricing, stating that Apollo is notably less efficient than other third-party apps. They asserted that the charges are based on usage levels comparable to Reddit’s own costs, as the platform incurs significant hosting fees. The spokesperson clarified that not all third-party apps would require paid access and reiterated that Reddit’s pricing aims to support fair compensation for its services.

Despite ongoing discussions between moderators and Reddit administrators, the blackout may continue until Reddit reverses its policy changes. Some communities, such as r/Music with its 32 million members, have announced an indefinite blackout until Reddit addresses their concerns. The situation remains dynamic, as different moderators and communities have varying perspectives and plans for their subreddits. However, given recent interactions with Reddit administrators, the moderator interviewed expressed skepticism about any potential reversal of the changes.

As the blackout unfolds, Reddit finds itself in a contentious battle with its own users and moderators. The outcome of this protest will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for the future of the platform and its relationship with the vibrant communities that have helped define it.

WhatsApp Launches Channels Feature, Expanding Messaging App Capabilities

WhatsApp, the world’s most popular messaging app, is taking its services beyond traditional messaging and phone calls with the introduction of a new feature called Channels. This feature enables admins to share information with their audience through one-way broadcasts, including texts, photos, and videos. WhatsApp aims to provide users with a private way to stay updated on their favorite sports teams, hobbies, or public officials. A similar feature was previously launched by Meta-owned Instagram in February.

In a recent blog post, WhatsApp expressed its goal to develop the most secure broadcast service available. The personal information of both admins and followers will be safeguarded, with no phone numbers shared between them. The decision to follow specific channels will remain private, ensuring privacy in an era where monitoring others’ social media activity has become a common hobby.

WhatsApp also plans to offer opportunities for admins to monetize their channels by expanding payment options and enabling channel promotion for broader reach.

With an estimated 2 billion users in 2020, WhatsApp holds a dominant position in the messaging app market. The addition of the broadcast tool is a response to long-standing user requests. While WhatsApp emphasizes that the core focus of the app remains on private messaging, this new feature aligns with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s strategy to monetize the platform.

Zuckerberg previously outlined his vision for business messaging in WhatsApp and Messenger, foreseeing it as a significant pillar of Meta’s future business endeavors. Additionally, Meta is exploring the integration of AI chat agents into WhatsApp and Messenger, aiming to introduce this technology to billions of users.

Despite its $19 billion price tag, WhatsApp has yet to generate substantial profits for Meta. Mark Zuckerberg has designated 2023 as the “year of efficiency” for the company, leading to mass layoffs, an increased focus on AI, and a reassessment of investment priorities, including the potential of the metaverse.

WhatsApp’s rollout of the channels feature will initially take place in Colombia and Singapore. The company plans to expand the availability of this feature to users in other countries in the coming months.

SEC Sues Coinbase, Alleging Unregistered Securities Exchange and Broker Activities

In a major blow to the cryptocurrency industry, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has launched a lawsuit against Coinbase, the largest crypto asset trading platform in the United States. The regulatory agency claims that Coinbase operated as an unregistered national securities exchange, broker, and clearing agency, which is in violation of federal securities laws.

The SEC argues that traditional securities markets separate brokers, exchanges, and clearing agencies, but Coinbase “intertwined” these functions, thereby denying investors the necessary protections. These protections include SEC inspections, safeguards against conflicts of interest, and recordkeeping requirements. The agency further alleges that Coinbase does not qualify for any exemptions from registration for any of these functions. According to the SEC, Coinbase has unlawfully profited in the billions of dollars from transaction fees by facilitating the buying and selling of crypto asset securities since at least 2019.

Gurbir S. Grewal, the director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, emphasized the importance of following regulations, stating, “You simply can’t ignore the rules because you don’t like them or because you’d prefer different ones: the consequences for the investing public are far too great.” He criticized Coinbase for knowingly disregarding the applicability of federal securities laws to its business activities, prioritizing its own profits over investor protection.

This recent complaint from the SEC follows an investigation into Coinbase’s potential illegal sale of unregistered securities, which was reported last July. Interestingly, the SEC’s action coincides with Coinbase’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, testifying before a congressional committee regarding a new draft bill aimed at implementing cryptocurrency regulations.

In response to the allegations, Coinbase stated that it had received a notice from the SEC in March about potential securities law violations but was not provided with sufficient details. The company claimed to have submitted multiple proposals to the SEC for registration, all of which were left unanswered by the agency.

The SEC’s lawsuit against Coinbase comes on the heels of its filing of 13 charges against Binance and its CEO Changpeng Zhao earlier this week. The regulatory agency accused Binance of circumventing compliance measures and deceiving investors and regulators. Additionally, the SEC has been involved in the government’s case against Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder and former CEO of FTX.

Coinbase is also facing regulatory actions at the state level, as a task force comprising regulators from ten states has issued a Show Cause Order against the exchange. The Alabama Securities Commission, one of the participating states, accused Coinbase of violating securities laws by offering its staking rewards program accounts to Alabama residents without proper registration. Coinbase has been given 28 days to provide a response as to why it should not be ordered to cease and desist from selling unregistered securities in the state of Alabama.

Apple Simplifies Access to Siri by Changing Wake Phrase to Just “Siri” in iOS 17 Update

In an effort to enhance user experience and streamline access to its virtual assistant, Apple has announced a significant change to Siri’s trigger phrase. The tech giant is set to replace the familiar “Hey Siri” wake word with a simpler and more intuitive command: “Siri.” This alteration, which will be implemented as part of the upcoming iOS 17 update, is aimed at making it easier for iPhone, iPad, Mac, and other device users to summon Siri effortlessly.

The decision to transition to a single wake word comes in the wake of a report from Bloomberg in November, which disclosed Apple’s intention to explore the possibility of consolidating Siri’s activation phrase. Previously, Apple had employed the two-word trigger “Hey Siri” due to the technical and training advantages it offered. However, the forthcoming change signifies a significant shift in Apple’s approach, as the company acknowledges the need to refine and optimize the user experience.

Apple’s competitors have also ventured into simplified wake phrases for their respective voice assistants. Amazon’s Alexa can be summoned with either “Hey Alexa” or simply “Alexa,” while Microsoft’s Cortana, which was discontinued on iOS and Android platforms in 2021, operated solely on the “Cortana” wake word. In contrast, Google Assistant continues to rely on the two wake phrases “Hey Google” or “OK Google” instead of a singular “Google” command. Should Google consider transitioning to a solitary wake word, it would necessitate careful consideration to prevent inadvertent triggering of the assistant during regular conversations that mention the word “Google,” given the verb-like usage it has acquired due to its widespread dominance in the realm of online search.

Apple enthusiasts eagerly anticipate the arrival of iOS 17, slated for release this September, when the new simplified trigger phrase for Siri is expected to be introduced. With this change, Apple aims to facilitate quicker and more efficient access to its virtual assistant, ultimately improving user interactions and productivity across its range of devices.